OMG Comments on Article “High-speed rail will take taxpayers for a ride”

So, the Washington Post runs this blast of an article against high speed rail — and public transit in general — in the USA. Hmm, not a big surprise. I enjoyed reading the article and getting that little bit of anger from the wild assumptions and incorrect causal relationships inferred in the article. THEN… I scroll down to the comments of readers of the opinion piece. INCREDIBLE responses! Truly worth a few minutes of your day to check this out. We have some great minds in this country and the internet allows us to voice our arguments. This is not to be missed:

Article and comments.

Does the BP Oil Spill Give High Speed Rail More Hope?

I have been pushing for train travel – primarily high speed rail – for some time now. Then, April 20, 2010, and the BP oil spill disaster brought it all home. No, if we had high speed rail – even a truly functional national system – in place even years prior, I think the demand for oil would still be great enough that BP would still have been drilling in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, and they still would have tried to make extra profits but cutting corners, and the spill would still have happened.

Oil Spill Could Boost Interest in Train Travel

Oil Spill Could Boost Interest in Train Travel

So, I don’t think train travel is the solution for our oil demand.

That being said, it will cut our demand for oil. And provide alternatives for those that wish to cut oil demand. And provide a convenient, comfortable form of travel. There are so many positives to train travel, that it is shocking that so little exists in this country. If only Amtrak could keep to their schedule and run an efficient operation. Or if only the federal government would build an interstate track system that would be leased to private train operators. If only … so many exist that could make our world a better place. So much damage by our demand for oil. The Gulf is in terrible shape and we need to act quickly to change. Already some evidence that the oil spill is promoting train travel – and high speed at that – starting with Wisconsin.

Casinos Spur High Speed Rail

Need to get to the casinos in a hurry? Good news:

High Speed Rail boosted by gamblers?

High Speed Rail boosted by gamblers?

A company hoping to build a high-speed train between Los Angeles and Las Vegas has added plans for a connecting line to Phoenix.

Entire article.

New York State Seeks High Speed Trains

Difficulty remains for passing high speed rail, as seen in New York state.

If installed, the high-speed trains would reduce the travel time from Albany to Buffalo to less than four hours

New York hopes to see high speed rail connect Albany and Buffalo

New York hopes to see high speed rail connect Albany and Buffalo

Luckily, the state has reached an agreement with CSX to upgrade their freight track to use for high speed rail.

Wisconsin Celebrates High Speed Rail

U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan joined state and local leaders in Milwaukee in celebrating new high-speed rail service.

What? High speed line from Milwaukee to Madison
Increased speed on the line from Milwaukee to Chicago
Feasibility study for a line from Madison to Minneapolis-St. Paul

Wisconsin high speed train

Wisconsin developing high speed rail

How? $823 million in federal stimulus

Disclaimer: It will be 2013 before the line reaches 110 mph, still much slower than other high speed routes in the world. But, a step in the right direction at least.

My home state misses out or does not care about this type of federal money and improvement to transit.

California High Speed Rail Hurdle

Nothing is ever easy in the US when it comes to transportation:

Map of Cal high speed rail

Map of Cal high speed rail

The state still intends to route high-speed trains to San Jose, through the Peninsula and to San Francisco along the Caltrain tracks despite a lawsuit that challenged the polarizing route decision, according to revised plans released Thursday.

Local news reports:

California developing high speed rail

California developing high speed rail


The report said the new alignment would also result in a “slightly higher magnitude” of property taking from San Jose to Gilroy, without providing specifics. It may also result in the cutting down of some potentially historic black walnut trees there.

I hate to see historic black walnut trees cut down. Is that necessary? Is there NO other way to accomplish this? Well, how about planting some NEW black walnut trees.

UK Wants Fast Trains to Link Cities

Train service in England

High Speed Rail in the UK

Britain determining that train travel – namely high speed rail – is the best solution for linking their cities together over planes or more roads. Yet, funding issues remain. Top quote:

Lord Adonis said the development could be financed through public-private partnerships, similar to the Channel Tunnel rail link. “I want Britain to be a pioneer in low-cost, mass-market high-speed rail,” he said.

Another interesting concept is a transit system that is environmentally sustainable and available for the general population, not just the well off. How interesting! A system of travel for all people, not just the elite!

Meanwhile, here in the USA what is the popular transit plan? Toll-roads, not only making travel easier for the well off, but benefiting the corporations that are contracted to build and manage the toll-roads. To think these toll-road owning corporations don’t pad the pockets of their favorite politicians is absurd. Why/how does this continue? Because the American public allows it. End of story.

Amtrak Wish List – Faster Trains

It is not rocket science. To increase passengers, Amtrak has done some nice advertising to show advantages over air travel, namely roomier seats, power outlets by seats, less hassles. And the payoff has been increased travel. But future survival likely depends on faster trains. According to this New York Times article,

For the Northeast corridor alone, Amtrak estimates that it will need almost $700 million annually for the next 15 years to maintain the system and to tackle a backlog of maintenance projects and upgrades. Reducing travel times between New York and Washington to two-and-a-half hours and times between New York and Boston to three hours — goals that were established in the 1970s — will require straighter track, improvements to bridges and tunnels, increased capacity through Manhattan and newer trains, among other investments.

Funding has improved with the Obama administration, but how long will that funding last, and that funding still does not provide the ability to get where Amtrak wants (and the US needs it) to go. We need more commitment from local, state and of course federal government to fund train travel or we risk our own economic success. The time to succeed is dwindling.

Amtrak wishes for faster trains

Amtrak wishes for faster trains

As the article points out, however, building passenger levels will build overall support for trains, so every little bit helps. Amtrak will be establishing free wi-fi service on many of their routes, again this is a step in the right direction. If Amtrak was visionary, they would have had free wi-fi on all trains 3 years ago (if not earlier). Better late than never? We’ll see.

Chicago to Saint Louis 220 mph train

The non-profit Midwest High Speed Rail Association is advocating for an $11.5 billion plan for a Chicago to St. Louis high-speed line that could reach 220 mph. That would place it among the fastest trains in the U.S. and would rival high-tech systems from Europe and Asia.

Chicago to St. Louis proposed high speed rail

Chicago to St. Louis proposed high speed rail

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/30/plan-calls-for-midwest-hi_n_223500.html